The infallibility of the Bible

Thus, the question and revelation that spans between recording and interpretation can not be dismissed by either one or the other.
The revelation away from the time and place of the world, that is a mere teaching, doctrine, or theory. It's not the revelation of Christ at all. It's not just a record of the case,also.

First of all, in order to show the salvation of Christ, the Son of God who came to this world, he had recorded the exact fact that he was truly human being. The cross is at the center of this record. But that's not all. Furthermore, we teach that this Nazareth of Jesus is in fact the Son of God and the Savior. In order to convey the reality of being the Son of God Christ as it is, this will interfere with the accuracy in terms of the record.If you keep the correctness of the record, it will be difficult to convey the inner reality that Jesus crucified is the son of God. There was a risk of losing track of what kind of person it was. Here, as we struggling for what was writing in the Bible, it's only just mistaking the problem if you contend that it wasn't really.

You have to read the meaning of the sentence behind,anyhow.It is impossible to think unilaterally in terms of recording without interpretation, only teaching that does not include recording, etc. We can really think of the “infallibility” of the Bible after considering two aspects.The revelation of God appearing in the Bible is not the only revelation of the record of humility. Therefore, the infallibility of the Bible can not be regarded as a mistake only in terms of mere recording. But on the contrary, it is not the only aspect of the theory that the disciples received a profound salvation teaching from Jesus, that is, only the revelation. Jesus of Nazareth, who was truly born in this world as a person and actually finished his life on the cross, was actually God and Christ.