The difference between sin and the consequences of sin.

In addition, there is another problem here. At that time, I do not think that the Jew put the person to death by the only thing that someone is a Messiah or the child of God for himself.
But none of the disciples have been put to death for that reason. The first church was not so opposed to Judaism at first. The reason why it gradually became an awkward relation, and it came to conflict violently at last is that the problem of the law was involved. It is not a conflict from the belief that Jesuit is the Son of God Christ. Jesuit and his disciples had already been greatly in their lives for the fact that they did not keep the Law. On the contrary, even if the Lord himself is said to be the Son of God, people are hardly stumbling. However, it is a big commotion to have cured the sickness on the Sabbath as the hand was not washed before meal.And even if the reason for the last death penalty, whether it was really transmitted as it is a little suspicious. Even with the frequency of the trial, Marco said it was only once, according to Luke. It doesn't make much difference, even once or twice. It is till then if it does not matter. However, it becomes clear only that it is not transmitted so surely at that time. This is generally biblical studies. You don't have to think about Christ in detail. However, it is not understood so clearly when thinking who was responsible for the terrible fact that the Bible was made a material, and the son christ of God was put on the cross and killed.
Of course, it might be responsible for the archbishop at that time. However, it is only as a result. At that time, there was only the post which had to take the last responsibility. It is not seen at all that the archbishop wanted to kill Jesus as a child Christ of God as one man.

From the results, Christ's Passion is a cruel thing that humans have joined forces together, tormented God's only-begotten child, and crucified him on the cross. However, when you think about the responsibility of who killed God's child, nothing is clear. Actually no one seems so especially bad. This is very similar to the responsibility of modern warfare. Many orders were given and terrible things were done. But where is the last "I did it" responsibility? unclear. The chief executive. However, there cannot be a big war with just a few people. I think everyone was very motivated. But no one wanted all of the miserable modern warfare. Increasingly, the whereabouts of responsibility are lost. This is not just about war. This is true for the whole movement of human society.

Why is the price going up this way? Everyone is responsible for someone. However, no matter what he says, prices are creeping up and there are no specifications. Similarly, there is no decisive factor regarding the death of Christ. The Gospels write Jewish officials very badly. But instead, I don't know what is wrong. On the contrary, there is only a terrible conflict between the early church and the Jewish officials. But then, isn't anyone responsible? I don't think so. As a result, a very hard thing has happened: Christ the Son of God is killed. However, there is a problem that cannot be solved by just taking responsibility.

Often there is a disparity between the responsibilities that people must take for themselves and the consequences of those responsibilities. In other words, there are many things that are irreversible no matter how much responsibility you take. If you take responsibility, will the dead person come back to life? Considering the damage caused by atomic bombs and the chemical industry, it is not only clear who is responsible. Even if the relationship of responsibility is clarified, the disastrous consequences can no longer be achieved. Even if you bow your head and pay several tens of trillions of yen, or hundreds of trillions of yen, you will not be able to restore one finger and one burn.

Moreover, countless lives and human lives are lost when it comes to war. Such a result is nothing, no matter who takes responsibility. In the future, where technology continues to advance, even if someone takes responsibility as an individual or a group, it will finally become impossible to recover. Once the destruction and poisoning spread, it can no longer be solved with a responsibility problem. The scope of responsibility is getting narrower. Of course, this is not just bad. Proceeding in the right direction will produce much better results than people expect. The more you move to the better, theoretically, you will realize a dream-like peace and a warm and well-being world. But movement in the real world is not so optimistic.