Ojoh!'s long-range story

The current Biblical Study

Even until now, there was a common thought about the historical miracles, based on the principle that Christ was the Savior and God, that he would actually do miracles, and that the savior who did not perform miracles would not be able to think. Of course, the correct conclusion might be drawn from there in general about the miracle.
But it It is only a general thing about the miracle.
It is not possible to interpret the clear cut viewpoint of an individual miracle.
It is because it can not judge from the whole to the thing of the part..

In fact, if you look at the results of your studies in the current Biblical study, you may not be able to say anything about the Bible by ignoring this. Not to say that all Bible studies are correct. That should be the wrong part. However, I want to become feelings of the place where it is thought very much both by hearing the place at least seriously.

b. What miracles mean?

Speaking of miracles, "because the law that applies to the world of nature is exceeded, it is described as a mysterious event which is not thought to happen in common sense". But the miracle in the Bible is the revelation that the Nazareth Jesus, the whole Bible, is Jesus Christ. From the whole of this revelation, if you try to think separately from the miracle alone, the meaning of such individual miracles will be lost. This comes from the character of the gospel itself. It is a character that the gospel cannot be thought like a mere record or report of the public Life of Christ. The whole of the New Testament is written to tell the faith that Jesus of Nazareth is God and Christ (the Savior). We are not merely writing about what happened to Jesus ' death. The description as the history is the limit necessary to preach the belief to the Jesuit Christ who died and was buried, and revived three days later. Therefore, even if the story of the miracle comes out in the Bible, it does not have the meaning in the miracle if it says in an extreme way. For the person who wrote the Bible, it is not what the miracle itself is. To convince people that the miracle was the savior of Jesus, there was a curiosity and a concern which had a miracle in the place how effective it was. It is a movement of nature that it is inevitable by all means to come out of the tendency to transform it according to the purpose when the expression is made more effective to tell people the conviction of the belief to Christ which is the purpose to write it in such a sentence even if it does from here. The writing is greatly different by each Gospel book also about one thing in fact.