Of course, this is a biblical reasoning

4) This is at the same time a reconfirmation of the mysterious events of the birth. It is a god, not a very ordinary person who was already at the age of a 12-year-old child, with a deep academic knowledge that is no match for a specialist scholar. However, the author does not believe that the boy Jesus is a god from the deeper academic knowledge. Rather, based on the fact of the resurrection of Jesus, he believes in the divinity of Jesus from there.

First of all, standing on the faith of the resurrection, from there, thinking that Jesus must not have been a normal person as a child, and of course must have had a deep academic knowledge as a god. There is. It shows an unusual, God-like, way of deep learning and dignity. Then I explain this more and say that for the boy Jesus, the temple is "the house of his own", he is the child of God, and the temple is his residence. Of course, this is a biblical reasoning. It seems to be true, but it is difficult to say that it is true.

5)From the above, in this place (rather than trying to convey the passage of what was actually in it), the Lord Jesus had already been a child, not a normal person but rather "a god, surely."Such desire to teach the divinity of the Lord Jesus had a strong feeling that is more pronounced.